The drafting approach is a common one, and can lead to 2 starkly different interpretations, namely either all of the children, grandchildren and great grandchildren of:
- the relationship between the father and the mother; or
- each of the father and the mother (i.e. including children from other relationships).
One of the leading cases is Boranga v Flintoff (1997) 19 WAR 1.
The case confirms that the primary task of courts is to discern the intention of the settlor from the words of the relevant trust deed, with reference to the position as at time the deed was entered into.
In this case the following facts were considered to be relevant in determining whether step-children would be included as beneficiaries under the phrase 'the children of A and B’:
- the ages of the stepchildren at the time the trust was established and whether the step- children were dependants of A or B at the time;
- whether the step-children had any special needs, e.g. a disability;
- the existence and ages of any children from the relationship of A and B at the settlement date;
- the ages of A and B at the settlement date and whether it was likely there would be any further children from the relationship of A and B; and
- the pattern of trust distributions and whether the step-children received distributions from the trust.
As usual, please make contact if you would like access to any of the content mentioned in this post.
** For the trainspotters, the title of today's post is riffed from the Thurston Moore song ‘Smoke of dreams’.
View here: