Today’s post considers the meaning of ‘beneficiary’, from a tax perspective as confirmed by the Federal Court in the case of Yazbek.
The decision confirms that a ‘beneficiary’ is not simply a person who, as a matter of fact, has obtained some tangible benefit from the trust, rather a beneficiary is someone who is entitled to enforce the trustee’s obligation to administer the trust according to its terms.
In other words, anyone named as a potential beneficiary, or a member of a class of beneficiaries (even if not specifically named) will be a beneficiary.
A comprehensive review of a trust deed should always include an analysis of every variation or resolution of a trustee or other person that may impact on the interpretation of the range of potential beneficiaries.
Some examples of documents that may impact and the class of potential beneficiaries include:
- resolutions of the trustee to add or remove beneficiaries pursuant to a power in the trust deed;
- nominations or decisions of persons nominated in roles such as a principal, appointor or nominator; and
- consequential changes triggered by the way in which the trust deed is drafted (for example, beneficiaries who are only potential beneficiaries while other named persons are living).
** for the trainspotters, ‘Sometimes’ is a song by Depeche Mode. Listen hear (sic):