This power can be extremely important where there is no, or a very narrow, power of variation in a trust instrument.
One of the leading cases in this area is Re Dion Investments Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1941.
In broad terms, the case involved a trust deed setup in 1973, which the trustee was wanting to amend so as to be able to better manage the trust property. The relevant legislative provision in New South Wales gave the court the power to amend a trust instrument so long as it was ‘expedient' for the management or administration of trust property.
In rejecting a request to amend the deed by inserting a comprehensive variation power (which in turn would have allowed the trustee to make such changes to the trust deed as it deemed appropriate from time to time), the court confirmed:
- The legislative provisions did not allow the court to simply insert into the deed a comprehensive power of variation.
- Only specific powers (in contrast to wide discretionary powers) with respect to a particular dealing will be granted under the legislation.
- It was however permissible for the court to confer particular and limited powers in relation to certain issues such as how to account for income and capital gains and related tax driven provisions.
- Despite not originally crafting its variation request along the lines that the court said was permissible, the trustee was permitted to make further submissions in accordance with the court’s recommendations for immediate approval.
The court confirmed that the requirements in the legislation were all met, namely:
- There needs to be a 'proposed dealing', being a 'sale, lease, mortgage, surrender, release, or disposition, or any purchase, investment, acquisition, expenditure, or transaction'.
- The dealing must be in the Court’s opinion 'expedient'.
- The dealing must be incapable of being effected because of an absence of power.
The same outcome was granted in the case of Cecil Investments Pty limited [2021] NSWSC 211, where the trust deed permitted only a variation to the 'powers' not 'trusts.
This case also confirmed that previous attempted variations to the trust deed were invalid as they breached the limitation set out in the power of variation against anything that purported to change beneficiaries who were takers-in-default of appointment.
As has been explained in numerous previous posts, a comprehensive power of variation is arguably one of the most important aspects of any trust deed.
It is important to keep in mind that the legislation is worded differently in each State, for example the Queensland Courts have a wider power than in NSW. Reference should therefore always be had to the specific wording of the legislation in the relevant jurisdiction.
As usual, please make contact if you would like access to any of the content mentioned in this post.
** For the trainspotters, the title of today's post is riffed from the Black Rebel Motor Cycle club song 'Salvation’.
View here: