Trustee decision making: will you make the right decision this time?**

The decision in Finch v Telstra Super Pty Ltd [2010] HCA confirms the situations where a decision of a trustee can be reviewed by a court.

In very broad terms, the position that seems to have evolved in this area, is that the exercise of a discretion by a trustee is not subject to review by the courts unless one of the following three factors is present:

1. The trustee does not act in good faith;
2. The trustee does not give real and genuine consideration to the exercise of the discretion and the purposes for which the discretion was granted; or
3. Reasons for the decision are provided by the trustee, but those reasons are unsound.

Furthermore, a trustee's decision cannot be reviewed unless on the material before the trustee it is one that no reasonable trustee could have made.

Given this test, best practice dictates trustees adopt a disciplined and detailed analysis of all possibly relevant issues before reaching a decision and clearly document their considerations.

Thus, as further explained in Scott v National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty [1998] 2 All ER 705, the matters a trustee should consider may not be limited to simple matters of fact but will, on occasion (indeed, quite often) include taking advice from appropriate experts, whether the experts are lawyers, accountants, actuaries, surveyors, scientists or whomsoever may be relevant.

While documenting all such investigations is critical, it is generally preferable to not formally record the reasons for the final decision as to do so unnecessarily exposes the trustee to a challenge based on having unsound reasons.

As usual, please make contact if you would like access to any of the content mentioned in this post.

** For the trainspotters, the title of today's post is riffed from the Smiths song ‘London’.

Listen here: